Yellowist Vladimir Umanets didn’t destroy Mark Rothko’s painting in Tate Modern, it was not an act of vandalism. He signed the Rothko’s painting and thus show that this painting is a potential piece of Yellowism. This action informs the contemporary world, that Rothko’s painting can stop to be a…
If it’s in the name of the avant-garde, so be it.
(I think)
Notes
-
zeidn reblogged this from thisisyellowism
-
snakecult reblogged this from thisisyellowism
-
snakecult likes this
-
sabastooge likes this
-
homelessbutclassy reblogged this from thisisyellowism and added:
i don’t know what...all this, but i think...pieces are...
-
veronicahhh reblogged this from thisisyellowism and added:
avant-garde, so be it. (I think)
-
patriciawells reblogged this from thisisyellowism
-
frankie-roberto reblogged this from loweasel
-
tecatetrain reblogged this from thisisyellowism and added:
ok
-
oyxgen likes this
-
wtttl-2099 likes this
-
press10 likes this
-
loweasel reblogged this from thisisyellowism and added:
I understand your explanation...has now lost all that made it wonderful. You argue that...
-
kyleluvsew likes this
-
litmusbread reblogged this from thisisyellowism and added:
LOOK AT THE STARS LOOK HOW THEY SHINE FOR YOU
-
lostinactingtown reblogged this from thisisyellowism and added:
destroyed though. Art has its meaning to the viewer...itself was given by the artist. If...
-
thisisyellowism posted this
